| Similarities
and Differences Between Canadian Energy Trusts
and U.S. Royalty Trusts
There are a few key differences between Canadian
energy trusts and U.S. royalty trusts. Whereas
U.S.-based royalty trusts (which are legally precluded
from making acquisitions financed by new debt
and/or equity and, therefore, cannot as readily
replace depleted reserves) are essentially blow-down
vehicles, the experience to date for Canadian
energy trusts has been very different. In fact,
Canadian energy trusts have managed, during certain
extended periods, to actually increase per trust
unit production, discounted cash flow value and
distributions, in addition to maintaining reasonable
monthly or quarterly distributions on the trust
units. The ability to acquire assets and finance
them with new equity, combined with a tax-efficient
structure, leads to a financial vehicle that is
radically different from its U.S. counterpart.
Apart from the ability to grow and replace reserves,
there are other noteworthy structural differences
between Canadian energy trusts and their U.S.
counterparts. Of these, the most significant relate
to the substantial component of U.S. royalty trust
assets that are actually overriding royalty interests,
as opposed to the vast majority of Canadian energy
trust assets, which are operated and non-operated
working interests. In this sense, Canadian energy
trusts are more similar to conventional oil and
gas production companies (albeit with no higher-risk
exploration activities) than U.S. royalty trusts,
which in many instances can be more accurately
characterized as financially structured derivative
instruments to oil and gas assets.
Canadian energy trusts appear to offer a somewhat
higher yield than their U.S. counterparts, which
may, in part, reflect the overriding royalty nature
of the U.S. royalty trusts’ cash flows (and,
therefore, lower operating leverage and capital
requirements). The U.S. royalty trusts typically
have no debt, reflecting the blow-down character
of their assets and operations and the absence
of acquisition activity. Meanwhile, Canadian energy
trusts do carry some debt, reflecting previous
acquisition activity and development capital,
which are typically funded, in whole or in part,
with debt. |
|
|